The following are excerpts from an article published on July 9, 2008 by the Associated Press titled "Senate Passes Eavesdropping Bill".
Bill Grants Immunity To Phone Companies That Listened In On Americans
The Senate sent the White House a bill overhauling bitterly disputed rules on secret U.S. government eavesdropping Wednesday, bowing to President George W. Bush's demand to shield telecommunications companies from lawsuits complaining they helped the U.S. spy on Americans.The relatively one-sided vote, 69-28, came only after a lengthy and heated debate that pitted privacy and civil liberties concerns against the desire to prevent terrorist attacks. It ended almost a year of wrangling in the Democratic-led Congress over surveillance rules and the president's warrantless wiretapping program that was initiated after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The House of Representatives passed the same bill last month, and Bush said he would sign it soon.
Opponents assailed the eavesdropping program, asserting that it imperiled citizens' rights of privacy from government intrusion. But Bush said the legislation protects those rights as well as Americans' security.
"This bill will help our intelligence professionals learn who the terrorists are talking to, what they're saying and what they're planing," he said in a brief White House appearance after the Senate vote.
The long fight in Congress centered on one main question: whether to protect from civil lawsuits any telecommunications companies that helped the government eavesdrop on American phone and computer lines without the permission or knowledge of a secret court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
The White House had threatened to veto the bill unless it immunized companies such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. from wiretapping lawsuits.
Forty-six lawsuits now stand to be dismissed because of the new law, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. But the fight has not ended. Civil rights groups are already preparing lawsuits challenging the bill's constitutionality, and four suits, filed against government officials, will not be dismissed.
Numerous lawmakers had spoken out strongly against the no-warrants eavesdropping on Americans, but the Senate voted its approval after rejecting amendments that would have watered down, delayed or stripped away the immunity provision.
The lawsuits center on allegations that the White House circumvented U.S. law by going around the FISA court, which was created 30 years ago to prevent the government from abusing its surveillance powers for political purposes, as was done in the Vietnam War and Watergate eras. The court is meant to approve all wiretaps placed inside the U.S. for intelligence-gathering purposes. The law has been interpreted to include international e-mail records stored on servers inside the U.S.
"This president broke the law," declared Sen. Russell Feingold, a Democrat from Wisconsin.
The Bush administration brought the wiretapping back under the FISA court's authority only after The New York Times revealed the existence of the secret program. A handful of members of Congress knew about the program from top secret briefings. Most members are still forbidden to know the details of the classified effort, and some objected that they were being asked to grant immunity to the telecoms without first knowing what they did.
Just under a third of the Senate, including Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, supported an amendment that would have stripped immunity from the bill. They were defeated on a 66-32 vote. Republican rival John McCain did not attend the vote.
Obama ended up voting for the final bill. Feingold voted no.
The bill tries to address concerns about the legality of warrantless wiretapping by requiring inspectors general inside the government to conduct a yearlong investigation into the program.
The measure effectively dismisses about 40 lawsuits that have been bundled together. But at least three other lawsuits against government officials will go forward.
The Associated Press
On Monday, I commented that our federal government does not have a good record in protecting our rights. Here is just one of too many examples to list. Our rights exist only in the classroom or in the debate forums, but do not exist in the government or the courtrooms. Too often are country is listed as the Land of the Free. This is evidence to the contrary. We are actually living in a Constitutional dictatorship, where by the President's own admission admits that the Constitution is just a piece of paper.
When will we stand up and demand change? Why should companies get immunity for illegally eavesdropping on our conversations, text messages, and emails? This is just wrong. As for the ever convenient stop terrorism reason, when have you heard of any details that all these illegal spying activities on our citizens actually resulted in the arrest and conviction of anyone doing any terrorist type activities? Think on this question for a minute. Why are there no arrests? Because our citizens are not doing terrorist actions. They just want the excuse to exhibit more control over us and want us to live in fear.
If we do nothing, we condone these detestable policies and actions.
As always, the choice is yours.
Men cry out under a load of oppression;
they plead for relief from the arm of the powerful. Job 35:9 (NIV)
If you have comments or questions, please feel free to contact me at the address below.
Email: DeltaInspire@panama-vo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment